Re: Diversion tactics
Posted by Deborah on 2/15/08
I read the paper and the transcripts, did you?
On 2/15/08, Mike B. wrote:
> Wow. You may get your chance to be like Sharon.
> You made this statement yesterday:
> "Do you really think that any statement made by Sharon
> regarding alteration of testimony, which the good doc
> What is YOUR proof to back up your statement that the doctor
> altered his testimony?
> On 2/15/08, Deborah wrote:
>> I guess Sharon is used to the tactics now. This is the
>> price that a decent person pays for having the courage and
>> backbone to stand up to such a horrendous atrocity that
>> impacts every one in this country regardless of any SES
>> considerations save ability to seek help when one finally
>> discovers that mold is making them or their loved ones ill.
>> Attacking for one word, I believe it was "substantially",
>> not the altered part, to deflect the greater outrage that
>> the entire premise for the promulgated paper was based on
>> one faulty rodent study and reached conclusions that are not
>> supported by other lofty organizations.
>> What Sharon has done as an advocate is admirable, what her
>> detractors have done is despicable. Perhaps they think
>> everyone will conveniently "forget" their serious
>> transgressions if they keep hammering on her for the use of
>> an adjective; guess it depends on what your definition of
>> "substantially" is.
Posts on this thread, including this one