Follow us!

    Re: Diversion tactics

    Posted by Deborah on 2/15/08

    I read the paper and the transcripts, did you?

    On 2/15/08, Mike B. wrote:
    > Wow. You may get your chance to be like Sharon.
    > You made this statement yesterday:
    > "Do you really think that any statement made by Sharon
    > regarding alteration of testimony, which the good doc
    > did,......."
    > What is YOUR proof to back up your statement that the doctor
    > altered his testimony?
    > On 2/15/08, Deborah wrote:
    >> I guess Sharon is used to the tactics now. This is the
    >> price that a decent person pays for having the courage and
    >> backbone to stand up to such a horrendous atrocity that
    >> impacts every one in this country regardless of any SES
    >> considerations save ability to seek help when one finally
    >> discovers that mold is making them or their loved ones ill.
    >> Attacking for one word, I believe it was "substantially",
    >> not the altered part, to deflect the greater outrage that
    >> the entire premise for the promulgated paper was based on
    >> one faulty rodent study and reached conclusions that are not
    >> supported by other lofty organizations.
    >> What Sharon has done as an advocate is admirable, what her
    >> detractors have done is despicable. Perhaps they think
    >> everyone will conveniently "forget" their serious
    >> transgressions if they keep hammering on her for the use of
    >> an adjective; guess it depends on what your definition of
    >> "substantially" is.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.