Re: Diversion tactics
Posted by Mike B. on 2/15/08
In this case, it was "judges" - the trial judge, and an appellate
panel of judges who affirmed the trial judge.
On 2/15/08, Deborah wrote:
> On 2/15/08, Mike B. wrote:
>>" So, you're willing to defend your statement based upon "the paper
>> and the transcripts" even though there has been a finding by a
>> court which says that the doctor did not alter his testimony?"
> When you say the "court", do you mean a judge or a jury?
Posts on this thread, including this one