Re: Kelman v. Kramer
Posted by Mike B. on 6/30/08
She lost. The court found she had not provided any new or
compelling evidence to overcome the findings of the appellate
court. She partially won a couple of discovery motions.
On 6/30/08, INTERESETED wrote:
> On 6/18/08, Mike B. wrote:
>> Motion for Summary Judgment to be heard at 1:30 on Friday.
> AND THE RESULTS ARE ????????????????
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Kelman v. Kramer, 6/18/08, by Mike B..
- Re: Kelman v. Kramer, 6/30/08, by INTERESETED .
- Re: Kelman v. Kramer, 6/30/08, by INTERESETED .
- Re: Kelman v. Kramer, 6/30/08, by Mike B..
- Re: Kelman v. Kramer, 6/30/08, by interested.
- Re: Kelman v. Kramer, 6/30/08, by Mike B..
|
1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.